Cubit vs BLoC: A Comprehensive Comparison for Flutter Developers

In the fast-evolving world of Flutter, choosing the right state management approach is crucial to building clean, scalable applications. Two standout frameworks—BLoC (Business Logic Component) and Cubit—are popular among Flutter developers, each with unique strengths for managing app state. Whether you’re scaling complex UIs or optimizing for simplicity, the right choice between BLoC and Cubit can enhance your app’s performance and maintainability.

This guide unpacks the key differences, benefits, and ideal use cases of BLoC and Cubit to help you confidently choose the best fit for your next Flutter project. So, gear up, Flutter developers, as we dive deep into the world of state management!

What are BLoC and Cubit?

BLoC (Business Logic Component):

An event-driven architecture where UI elements emit events that trigger state changes processed by Blocs. It enforces a strict separation of concerns and fosters predictable state management.

Key Features:

• Event-driven architecture: UI interactions trigger events, which are processed by Blocs to update state.
• Strict separation of concerns: UI, business logic, and data are kept separate for better maintainability.
• Predictable state management: State changes follow a clear pattern, making app behavior easier to understand.

Structure:

• Events: Represent user interactions or external triggers.
• States: Represent the current state of the app's UI or data.
• Bloc class: Maps events to states using a mapEventToState function. Benefits:
• Testability: Blocs can be easily tested in isolation due to their clear structure.
• Debugability: State changes can be traced back to events for easier debugging.
• Scalability: Well-suited for complex apps with intricate logic.

Cubit:

A lighter version of BLoC, offering a simpler, method-based approach for state manipulation. While events are still present, they're handled directly within methods for a more streamlined approach.

Key Features:

• Simpler, method-based approach: State is updated directly through methods, reducing boilerplate code.
• Lightweight: Ideal for smaller apps or simpler UI elements.
• Gentler learning curve: Easier to grasp for beginners. Structure:
• Cubit class: Extends Cubit<State> and provides methods to update state.

Benefits:

• Faster development: Less code to write and maintain.
• Easier setup: Less configuration required compared to BLoC.

Head-to-Head Comparison:

Feature	BLoC	Cubit
Complexity	More complex: requires events, states, and mappings	Simpler: methods handle state updates directly
Boilerplate	More boilerplate with event classes and mappings	Less boilerplate, cleaner code
Learning Curve	Steeper learning curve due to more moving parts	Gentler learning curve, ideal for beginners
Testability	Easier to test due to isolated event handling	Slightly more complex testing due to method-based approach
Debugability	Traceability of state changes through events	No event history, debugging requires analyzing methods
Advanced Features	Offers features like debounce, throttling, and error handling	Limited built-in features, relies on external libraries
Scalability	Scales well for complex logic with numerous events	Suitable for simpler UI elements and logic

Code Examples:

BLoC:

1// Event
2class LoginButtonPressedEvent {}
3
4// State
5class LoginInProgressState {}
6class LoginSuccessState {}
7class LoginErrorState {}
8
9// Bloc
10class LoginBloc extends Bloc<LoginEvent, LoginState> {
11  @override
12  Stream<LoginState> mapEventToState(LoginEvent event) async* {
13    if (event is LoginButtonPressedEvent) {
14      yield LoginInProgressState();
15      // Perform login logic
16      try {
17        // Login successful
18        yield LoginSuccessState();
19      } catch (e) {
20        // Login error
21        yield LoginErrorState();
22      }
23    }
24  }
25}

Cubit:

1class CounterCubit extends Cubit<int> {
2  void increment() => emit(state + 1);
3  void decrement() => emit(state - 1);
4}

When to Choose Cubit:

• Simpler UIs: For straightforward screens with minimal logic, Cubit's lightweight approach shines.
• Faster Development: When deadlines loom, Cubit's easier setup and code can save valuable time.
• Learning: For beginners, Cubit's gentler curve eases them into state management concepts.

When to Choose BLoC:

• Complex Logic: When intricate UIs with numerous events unfold, BLoC's strict structure provides clarity and control.
• Advanced Features: If debouncing, throttling, or error handling are crucial, BLoC's built-in functionalities come in handy.
• Scalability: For large projects with potential growth, BLoC's well-defined architecture adapts effectively.

Choosing the Right Fit

Both Cubit and BLoC are excellent state management solutions in Flutter. Choosing the right one depends on your project's needs, skills, and preferences. Remember, Cubit excels in simplicity and ease, while BLoC shines in complexity and advanced features. So, weigh your options, explore the examples, and pick the tool that empowers your Flutter journey!

Don't be afraid to mix and match! Start with Cubit for simpler screens and graduate to BLoC when complexity demands it. Both frameworks play in the same sandbox, so don't hesitate to utilize their strengths for a winning state management strategy.

Happy Fluttering!

Short on time? Speed things up with DhiWise!!

Tired of manually designing screens, coding on weekends, and technical debt? Let DhiWise handle it for you!

You can build an e-commerce store, healthcare app, portfolio, blogging website, social media or admin panel right away. Use our library of 40+ pre-built free templates to create your first application using DhiWise.