Build 10x products in minutes by chatting with AI - beyond just a prototype.
Topics
When developing a React application, choosing the right router component is crucial for ensuring efficient navigation and user experience.
In this article, we will delve into the differences between BrowserRouter and HashRouter, two key routers provided by the react-router-dom package. We’ll explore their mechanisms, use cases, and how they affect the behavior of your web application, including how the browser router utilizes the History API to manage clean routes without the hash character and the hash router's use of the URL's hash portion for client-side routing in single-page applications.
React Router is a standard library for routing in React apps. It enables the navigation between different components in a single page application, without the need for a full page reload. This client side routing approach helps maintain a seamless user experience, akin to that of a traditional multi-page website.
The react-router-dom package extends React Router with bindings for web applications. It provides router components like BrowserRouter and HashRouter, which are essential for adding navigation functionality to your React app. These components sync the UI with the current URL, making it possible to bookmark and share URLs.
BrowserRouter is a router implementation that uses the HTML5 history API to keep your UI in sync with the URL. By utilizing the History API, the browser router manages clean routes without the hash character, making the URLs more readable and SEO-friendly.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11import { BrowserRouter as Router, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom"; const App = () => ( <Router> <div> <Link to="/">Home</Link> <Link to="/about">About</Link> <Route exact path="/" component={Home} /> <Route path="/about" component={About} /> </div> </Router> );
To maintain clean routes in a client side react application, BrowserRouter requires server side configuration. This ensures that all requests sent to the server return the same HTML file, regardless of the current route, allowing the React app to handle the routing.
Server-side rendering with BrowserRouter can be complex, as the web server must handle requests for dynamic routes. However, it provides a better user experience, as the server sends a fully rendered page to the client, which can be particularly beneficial for SEO and performance on legacy browsers.
HashRouter uses the hash portion of the URL (the part following the hash symbol) to keep your UI in sync with the URL. It’s a client-side routing method that doesn’t require any server-side configuration, as the hash value is never sent to the server. Implementing a hash router is straightforward and visually different from BrowserRouter, as it includes the hash symbol in the URL, making it suitable for legacy browsers and single-page applications.
Copy
Caption
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13import { HashRouter as Router, Route, Link } from "react-router-dom"; const App = () => ( <Router> {" "} <div> {" "} <Link to="/">Home</Link> <Link to="/about">About</Link> <Route exact path="/" component={Home} /> <Route path="/about" component={About} /> </div> </Router> );
HashRouter is particularly useful when you have a static file server and cannot configure the server to handle dynamic routes. It’s also beneficial when you need to support legacy browsers that do not support the history API, making the hash router an ideal choice for single-page applications.
The main difference between browser router and hash router lies in how they handle the URL and interact with the web server. Browser router utilizes the History API to manipulate the browser history with JavaScript, creating clean URLs without the hash character, and requires server configuration to respond to specific routes. In contrast, hash router uses the hash portion of the URL to manage route changes, making it suitable for legacy browsers and single-page applications, but it has limitations for SEO.
HashRouter is the right choice when you need to support legacy browsers or when you’re working in non-browser environments, such as some Cordova or Electron apps. Using a hash router is also useful when you cannot control the server configuration, as it doesn’t require server-side support for routing.
HashRouter is not recommended for modern web applications because it does not support server side rendering and can lead to hash routing, which is not as clean or user-friendly as the routes provided by BrowserRouter. Furthermore, the hash router can cause issues with SEO, as search engines might ignore the hash portion of the URL.
While HashRouter works well in traditional web browsers, it has limitations in non-browser environments like React Native, where the URL-based navigation model does not apply. In these cases, the routing needs to be handled differently.
In React Native, navigation is typically handled by libraries specifically designed for mobile apps, which do not rely on URLs. Therefore, HashRouter is not suitable for such environments where the URL-based navigation model does not exist.
In the React Router library, createBrowserRouter is a function that can be used to configure a router that uses the HTML5 history API. This function is often seen as a more flexible alternative to the standard BrowserRouter, allowing for more advanced configuration and potentially replacing the need for HashRouter in some cases.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16import { createBrowserRouter, RouterProvider, Route } from 'react-router-dom'; const router = createBrowserRouter([ { path: '/', element: <Home />, }, { path: '/about', element: <About />, }, ]); const App = () => ( <RouterProvider router={router} /> );
MemoryRouter is another alternative within the React Router library that is useful for non-browser environments. It keeps the history of your routes in memory (not in the URL), making it a good option for tests and environments where you don't need to maintain a history stack.
Let's look at an example of how to implement two routes using both BrowserRouter and HashRouter. This will help illustrate the differences in how they render components and manage the current route.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11// Using BrowserRouter <BrowserRouter> <Route exact path="/" component={Home} /> <Route path="/about" component={About} /> </BrowserRouter> // Using HashRouter <HashRouter> <Route exact path="/" component={Home} /> <Route path="/about" component={About} /> </HashRouter>
Transitioning from HashRouter to BrowserRouter involves ensuring that your web server can handle all routes and return the correct HTML file. Here's a basic guide on how to make the switch:
Configure your web server to handle all routes and serve the same HTML entry point file.
Replace HashRouter with BrowserRouter in your React app's main file.
Test your application to ensure that all routes are working correctly and that the server is properly handling requests.
To maintain clean routes in a React application, use BrowserRouter whenever possible. Ensure that your server is configured to handle dynamic routing and that your routes are defined clearly within your React components.
To keep your UI components in sync with the current route path, use the useLocation and useHistory hooks provided by React Router. These hooks allow you to access the current URL and history stack, making it easy to update your UI based on route changes.
In conclusion, the choice between BrowserRouter and HashRouter should be determined by your specific needs and the constraints of your project. BrowserRouter offers cleaner URLs and better SEO, but requires server-side support. HashRouter, on the other hand, is easier to set up and is suitable for static servers and legacy browser support.
By understanding the differences and considering the needs of your users and your server infrastructure, you can choose the most appropriate router for your React application.
